epq

Thing 1's amazing epq!
Log | Files | Refs | LICENSE

commit 57634554007cfbbc093ccfca149880acd4a29a40
parent afce35c3950c2d3c9e0a111cde65eb9dca8714a2
Author: thing1 <thing1@seacrossedlovers.xyz>
Date:   Thu, 30 Jan 2025 12:01:42 +0000

started on final edits, finish is in site

Diffstat:
Mpresentation/presentation.tex | 1+
Mwriteup/writeup.tex | 2+-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/presentation/presentation.tex b/presentation/presentation.tex @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ -- So why is it preferred? \\ -- How did the project go? \\ -- What would I change/How would I do it again? \\ + -- Questions \\ \end{frame} % ~1-2 mins diff --git a/writeup/writeup.tex b/writeup/writeup.tex @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ is split into many different distributions that are all individually maintained, meant for more specific use cases. All of them will be more private than non-free alternatives as they are so rigorously checked. Some privacy specific ones exist such as tails OS\cite{TAILSOS}, and some are designed for more offensive privacy and security such as Kali Linux \cite{KALIlinux}. -\subsection{Why is this better for them?} +\subsection{Why is Proprietary software not applicable for this use case?} For privacy experts and enthusiasts, Free and open tools are preferable for the fact that they know what is happening internally. If a user were using non free tools, it would be impossible to know weather the code running had their privacy in mind, or if it would be sending data to a large corporation or other such entity. For this reason free and open software is perfect, there cant be any hidden malicious intentions as they would be